This or that...

Cognitive dissonance is an interesting experience... to say the least. You hear a new theory, your old theories are confronted and inconsistent with the new theory, you think (hopefully), and then make a decision.  And sometimes... these decisions are big... lifestyle changing... world-view altering.

I needed a way to soundly deliberate conflicting theories; the evaluation comprises of, but are not limited to, these three modes of thinking:

• Critical thinking (logical reasoning, mutli-dimensional analysis, world literature, etc.)
• Scientific Research and Methods (scientific methods, literature and contemporary evaluations, new research, etc.)
• Faith and Ethics (Catholic & religious thought/insight, ethical implications, moral dilemmas, etc.)

Sure, it may sound exhaustive... but should there be any less of a standard?